THE “TRIPP” AS A STABILIZING FACTOR IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS? OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54503/2953-8165-2026.5(1)-45

Keywords:

TRIPP, South Caucasus, opportunities, challenges, peacebuilding, interdependence, connectivity initiatives

Abstract

The “TRIPP” initiative, although not formally codified as a singular institutional framework, can be conceptualized as a set of coordinated transport and infrastructure development projects in the South Caucasus aimed at enhancing interregional connectivity between Europe and Asia. Emerging in the context of renewed diplomatic engagement - particularly under the mediation of the United State - and potential agreements between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the initiative is increasingly associated with the strategic expansion of the Middle Corridor.

From a geopolitical and geo-economic perspective, TRIPP offers significant opportunities for regional stabilization. By fostering economic interdependence, infrastructure integration, and diversified transit routes, it may contribute to confidence-building and long-term peacebuilding in a region marked by over three decades of conflict and instability following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The emphasis on principles such as sovereignty, territorial integrity, and jurisdictional control constitutes a normative foundation for sustainable cooperation.

However, the initiative also entails notable challenges. Persistent political tensions, unresolved aspects of the Armenia-Azerbaijan former conflict, and competing regional narratives - such as Azerbaijan’s discourse on “Western Azerbaijan” and the concept of the “Zangezur Corridor” - introduce elements of strategic ambiguity and latent instability. These factors may undermine trust and complicate the implementation of cooperative infrastructure projects in the South Caucasus.

Furthermore, TRIPP must be situated within a broader geopolitical context involving regional and extra-regional actors, including Turkey, Iran, the European Union, and Russia, each pursuing distinct strategic and economic interests in the South Caucasus. The interplay of these actors shapes both the opportunities and constraints of this initiative where the principal role is played by the United States.

This study argues that while TRIPP holds the potential to function as a stabilizing factor by promoting regional connectivity and economic cooperation, its success will depend on the alignment of political will, the management of competing narratives, and the establishment of robust institutional mechanisms ensuring transparency, inclusivity, and respect for international norms.

References

Aktas, A. (2026). Azerbaijan’s Aliyev Says Peace Treaty Possible ‘Very Next Day’ if Armenia Amends Constitution. “Anadolu Ajansı”. Retrieved March 14, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/KatMk.

André, M. C., Delanote, J., Aira Gutierrez, D., Harasztosi, P. & Weiss, C. (2024). Navigating Supply Chain Disruptions. European Investment Bank. Retrieved March 3, 2026, from: https://tinyurl.com/45skuzux.

Avdaliani, E. (2025). Trump’s Road TRIPP Delivers a Deal. Center for European Policy Analysis. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from: https://shorturl.at/dUZs2.

Baldwin, D. (2016). Power and International Relations: A Conceptual Approach. Princeton University Press.

Barbieri, K. (2002). The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? University of Michigan Press. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.16590.

Canbäck, R. (2025). Azerbaijan’s ‘Western Azerbaijan’ Campaign Exposed in Leaked Documents. “OC Media”. Retrieved March 14, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/Beao7.

Collier, P., Elliott, V., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M. & Sambanis, N. (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. A World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.

Cooley, A. & Nexon, D. (2020). Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. Oxford University Press.

Cornell, S. E. (2001). Small Nations and Great Powers: A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict in the Caucasus. UK: RoutledgeCurzon Press.

European Commission. (2021). Global Gateway. Retrieved March 7, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/wMgqA.

European Commission. (2022). REPowerEU: Affordable, Secure and Sustainable Energy for Europe. Retrieved March 9, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/qUKPw.

European Commission. (n.d. a). EU Secure Connectivity Programme. Retrieved February 8, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/V3xI7.

European Commission. (n.d. b). Policies: Global Gateway. Retrieved March 7, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/EoORB.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, No. 3. 167–191.

Haas, E. B. (1958). “The Uniting of Europe”: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Halsey, J. & Ali, T. (2026). Armenia and Azerbaijan Implement Peace: Next Steps in Constructing the TRIPP. Caspian Policy Center. Retrieved January 24, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/CivP8.

Hendrix, C. & Brinkman, H. (2013). Food Insecurity and Conflict Dynamics: Causal Linkages and Complex Feedbacks. Stability: International Journal of Security & Development, Vol. 2, Iss. 2. 1–18. DOI: 10.5334/sta.bm.

Hopf, T. (2002). Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Hover, R., Buchenrieder, G. & Sokolsky, J. (2025). Economic Interdependence and the Likelihood of War – a Systematic Literature Review. Cogent Social Sciences, Vol. 11, Iss. 1. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2025.2488114.

Jenelius, E. & Mattsson, L.-G. (2021). Resilience of Transport Systems. In R. Vickerman (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Transportation (258–267). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10719-5.

Joint Declaration by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia on the outcomes of their meeting in Washington D.C., USA, August 8, 2025. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from: https://shorturl.at/4eDnr.

Keohane, R. & Nye, J. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt7sq9s.

Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization. New York: Random House.

Kopalyan, N. (2026). Aliyev’s Forked-Tongue Policy: Peace Meets Anti-Armenian Propaganda. EVN Report. Retrieved March 14, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/xzWo4.

Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.

Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan.

Mansfield, E. & Snyder, J. (2006). Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Moravcsik A. (1997). Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 4. 513–553. DOI: 10.1162/002081897550447.

Official Website of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia. (2025). The TRIPP, the Opening of Communication between Armenia and Türkiye have Full Potential to Become an Important Component of the Middle Corridor. Retrieved December 13, 2025, from: https://shorturl.at/vBYGC.

Official Website of the United States Government. (2026). TRIPP Implementation Framework (TIF). Retrieved January 16, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/1bK4o.

Oneal, J. & Russett, B. (1999). The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992. World Politics, Vol. 52, No. 1. 1–37.

Ordukhanyan, E., Sukiasyan, H., Shirinyan, L. & Ananyan, G. (2025). A New Balance of Power in the South Caucasus: How Can It Lead to Regional Stability?. International Journal of Innovative Research and

Scientific Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2. 206–220. DOI: 10.53894/ijirss.v8i2.5138.

Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rentschler, J., Reinhardt, A., Elbert, R. & Hummel, D. (2025). The Trans-Caspian Corridor – Geopolitical Implications and Transport Opportunities. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104211.

Richmond, O. (2011). A Post-Liberal Peace. Routledge.

Rodrik, D. (2008). Normalizing Industrial Policy. Commission on Growth and Development. Working Paper, No. 3. DOI: 10.1596/28009.

Sidaway, J. & Woon, C. Y. (2017). Chinese Narratives on “One Belt, One Road” (一带一路) in Geopolitical and Imperial Contexts. The Professional Geographer, Vol. 69, Iss. 4. 591–603. DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2017.1288576.

Starr, S. F. (2026). The Middle Corridor: Reality vs. Rhetoric. The Red Line. Retrieved January 24, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/IcfKQ.

Trans-Caspian International Transport Route. (n.d.). Retrieved February 22, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/CFvu9.

Trenin, D. (2011). Post-Imperium: A Eurasian Story. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

United Nations. (2009). Report of the Secretary-General on Peacebuilding in the Immediate Aftermath of Conflict. Secretary-General on the Peacebuilding Fund. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from: https://shorturl.at/D0Mud.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511612183.

World Bank. (2019). Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1392-4.

Zakaryan, T. (2021). Landlocked with Closed Borders: Armenia’s Problem of Access to the Sea. Caucasus Survey, Vol. 9, No. 2. 192–208. DOI: 10.1080/23761199.2021.1922866.

Zartman, I. W. (2001). The Timing of Peace Initiatives. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, Vol. 1, No. 1. 8–18.

Downloads

Published

05/06/2026

How to Cite

THE “TRIPP” AS A STABILIZING FACTOR IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS? OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES. (2026). The POLITNOMOS. Journal of Political and Legal Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.54503/2953-8165-2026.5(1)-45